Are some coworking spaces evolving into private clubs? This week NPR reported that NYC coworking space Grind is now accepting members by application, meaning that some freelancers may not make the cut to become “part of the family” - a Grindist.
Is this development a creative, financial, and social disconnect? Coworking is meant to be open and collaborative, building on the serendipity of different minds approaching the same problem. Is it possible to disrupt the system when all great minds are thinking on same wavelength?
There is always one person in any group who doesn’t play well with others, but suppose that dischord leads to greater harmony down the line? Limiting a space to the “cool kids” or the free radicals is counterproductive to innovation and random flashes of brilliance.
Second is the issue of financial viability. With only a small percentage of current coworking spaces operating in the black, and a great increase of freelancers worldwide, it’s important for coworking space owners to pursue all quality revenue streams. Members and users equal customers, which equal revenue; and revenue is critical to sustainability.
It’s ironic that the very people who are most drawn to coworking, those sworn individuals, are gravitating beyond curation to exclusivity. With community manager guidance, coworking spaces find a level of their own. It’s an organic process that celebrates the role of chance and honors the ethic of being open and collaborative.
Also, check out this excellent infographic on freelancing.






